| Survey of Faculty Opinion on the Current Evaluation System |
| Q1: First, please share with us the Division in which you are employed. |
| First, please share with us the Division in which you are employed. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Professional Programs |
11 |
31.4% |
 |
| Humanities & Social Programs |
8 |
22.9% |
 |
| Sciences & Mathematics |
6 |
17.1% |
 |
| Arts |
5 |
14.3% |
 |
| Library & Information |
4 |
11.4% |
 |
| Albany |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Totals |
35 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
-- |
|
| Q2: 1. The current faculty evaluation system provides for an adequate appraisal of my contributio... |
| 1. The current faculty evaluation system provides for an adequate appraisal of my contributions to the College. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
3 |
8.1% |
 |
| Agree |
11 |
29.7% |
 |
| Neutral |
9 |
24.3% |
 |
| Disagree |
7 |
18.9% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
4 |
10.8% |
 |
| No Opinion |
1 |
2.7% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
2 |
5.4% |
 |
| Totals |
37 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.97 |
|
| Q3: 2. The current faculty evaluation system provides for a fair comparison of my performance wit... |
| 2. The current faculty evaluation system provides for a fair comparison of my performance with that of colleagues within my department. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
2 |
5.4% |
 |
| Agree |
14 |
37.8% |
 |
| Neutral |
5 |
13.5% |
 |
| Disagree |
9 |
24.3% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
3 |
8.1% |
 |
| No Opinion |
1 |
2.7% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
3 |
8.1% |
 |
| Totals |
37 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
4.00 |
|
| Q4: The evaluation criteria in the current system are: |
| The evaluation criteria in the current system are: |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| too lenient |
3 |
13.6% |
 |
| too harsh |
4 |
18.2% |
 |
| "just right" |
15 |
68.2% |
 |
| Totals |
22 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
1.45 |
|
| Q5: 3. The current faculty evaluation system provides for a fair comparison of my performance wit... |
| 3. The current faculty evaluation system provides for a fair comparison of my performance with that of colleagues within my division. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
2 |
5.4% |
 |
| Agree |
8 |
21.6% |
 |
| Neutral |
8 |
21.6% |
 |
| Disagree |
10 |
27.0% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
4 |
10.8% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.4% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
3 |
8.1% |
 |
| Totals |
37 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.65 |
|
| Q6: The evaluation criteria in the current system are: |
| The evaluation criteria in the current system are: |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| too lenient |
4 |
22.2% |
 |
| too harsh |
3 |
16.7% |
 |
| "just right" |
11 |
61.1% |
 |
| Totals |
18 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
1.61 |
|
| Q7: 4. The current faculty evaluation system provides for a fair comparison of my performance wit... |
| 4. The current faculty evaluation system provides for a fair comparison of my performance with that of colleagues from other divisions. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Agree |
5 |
13.9% |
 |
| Neutral |
5 |
13.9% |
 |
| Disagree |
12 |
33.3% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
7 |
19.4% |
 |
| No Opinion |
5 |
13.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
2 |
5.6% |
 |
| Totals |
36 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
2.94 |
|
| Q8: 5. The current faculty evaluation system provides information of value for improving my teach... |
| 5. The current faculty evaluation system provides information of value for improving my teaching. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Agree |
6 |
17.1% |
 |
| Neutral |
5 |
14.3% |
 |
| Disagree |
7 |
20.0% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
13 |
37.1% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.7% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Totals |
35 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.09 |
|
| Q9: 6. The current faculty evaluation system provides valuable information for improving my effor... |
| 6. The current faculty evaluation system provides valuable information for improving my efforts toward professional growth. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Agree |
14 |
41.2% |
 |
| Neutral |
4 |
11.8% |
 |
| Disagree |
7 |
20.6% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
6 |
17.6% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.74 |
|
| Q10: 7. The current faculty evaluation system provides information of value for improving my serv... |
| 7. The current faculty evaluation system provides information of value for improving my service to the College. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Agree |
10 |
29.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
11 |
32.4% |
 |
| Disagree |
6 |
17.6% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
5 |
14.7% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.65 |
|
| Q11: 8. The current faculty evaluation system provides the College with a valid means for assessi... |
| 8. The current faculty evaluation system provides the College with a valid means for assessing the value of my overall contributions to the College. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Agree |
10 |
29.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
9 |
26.5% |
 |
| Disagree |
9 |
26.5% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
5 |
14.7% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.79 |
|
| Q12: 9. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately acknowledges my contributions to the ... |
| 9. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately acknowledges my contributions to the College in the area of teaching. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Agree |
10 |
29.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
7 |
20.6% |
 |
| Disagree |
8 |
23.5% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
8 |
23.5% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.65 |
|
| Q13: 10. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately acknowledges my contributions to the... |
| 10. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately acknowledges my contributions to the College in the area of professional development. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Agree |
15 |
44.1% |
 |
| Neutral |
8 |
23.5% |
 |
| Disagree |
7 |
20.6% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
3 |
8.8% |
 |
| No Opinion |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.97 |
|
| Q14: 11. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately acknowledges my contributions to the... |
| 11. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately acknowledges my contributions to the College in the area of service. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Agree |
13 |
38.2% |
 |
| Neutral |
8 |
23.5% |
 |
| Disagree |
11 |
32.4% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
2 |
5.9% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.94 |
|
| Q15: 12. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately allocates evaluative weight to the a... |
| 12. The current faculty evaluation system appropriately allocates evaluative weight to the areas of teaching, professional growth, and service. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
3 |
8.8% |
 |
| Agree |
11 |
32.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
7 |
20.6% |
 |
| Disagree |
6 |
17.6% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
6 |
17.6% |
 |
| No Opinion |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.88 |
|
| Q16: Teaching |
| Teaching |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| 50 |
8 |
27.6% |
 |
| 60 |
7 |
24.1% |
 |
| 70 |
4 |
13.8% |
 |
| 75 |
4 |
13.8% |
 |
| 65 |
2 |
6.9% |
 |
| 90 |
2 |
6.9% |
 |
| 40 |
1 |
3.4% |
 |
| 80 |
1 |
3.4% |
 |
| Totals |
29 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
-- |
|
| Q17: Professional Growth: |
| Professional Growth: |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| 20 |
10 |
35.7% |
 |
| 15 |
4 |
14.3% |
 |
| 30 |
4 |
14.3% |
 |
| 10 |
3 |
10.7% |
 |
| 25 |
3 |
10.7% |
 |
| 40 |
2 |
7.1% |
 |
| 35 |
1 |
3.6% |
 |
| 5 |
1 |
3.6% |
 |
| Totals |
28 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
-- |
|
| Q18: Service: |
| Service: |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| 10 |
11 |
39.3% |
 |
| 15 |
6 |
21.4% |
 |
| 20 |
4 |
14.3% |
 |
| 30 |
2 |
7.1% |
 |
| 5 |
2 |
7.1% |
 |
| 0 |
1 |
3.6% |
 |
| 25 |
1 |
3.6% |
 |
| 40 |
1 |
3.6% |
 |
| Totals |
28 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
-- |
|
| Q19: 14. Creating an evaluation system that has more flexibility to assign varying weights to tea... |
| 14. Creating an evaluation system that has more flexibility to assign varying weights to teaching, professional growth, and service dependent on individual faculty characteristics would be a valued im |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
6 |
18.8% |
 |
| Agree |
13 |
40.6% |
 |
| Neutral |
9 |
28.1% |
 |
| Disagree |
4 |
12.5% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
32 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
4.66 |
|
| Q20: 15. One campus-wide faculty system is appropriate to meet the needs of the faculty for forma... |
| 15. One campus-wide faculty system is appropriate to meet the needs of the faculty for formative feedback (feedback used to inform faculty members about the perceptions of their performance by respond |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
2.6% |
 |
| Agree |
6 |
15.8% |
 |
| Neutral |
10 |
26.3% |
 |
| Disagree |
10 |
26.3% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
7 |
18.4% |
 |
| No Opinion |
4 |
10.5% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
38 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.26 |
|
| Q21: 16. A single campus-wide faculty evaluation system is appropriate to meet the needs of the f... |
| 16. A single campus-wide faculty evaluation system is appropriate to meet the needs of the faculty for evaluative feedback (feedback used by leadership to evaluate the performance of the faculty membe |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
4 |
10.5% |
 |
| Agree |
7 |
18.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
8 |
21.1% |
 |
| Disagree |
12 |
31.6% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
5 |
13.2% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.3% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
38 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.66 |
|
| Q22: 17. Each division should have its own evaluation rubric/system. |
| 17. Each division should have its own evaluation rubric/system. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
5 |
13.5% |
 |
| Agree |
16 |
43.2% |
 |
| Neutral |
2 |
5.4% |
 |
| Disagree |
5 |
13.5% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
8 |
21.6% |
 |
| No Opinion |
1 |
2.7% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
37 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
4.05 |
|
| Q23: 18. Student evaluations of classroom performance are an important component of a sound facul... |
| 18. Student evaluations of classroom performance are an important component of a sound faculty evaluation system. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
4 |
11.8% |
 |
| Agree |
10 |
29.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
9 |
26.5% |
 |
| Disagree |
10 |
29.4% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
4.18 |
|
| Q24: 19. The current instrument used by students to evaluate classroom performance (SIR II) is a ... |
| 19. The current instrument used by students to evaluate classroom performance (SIR II) is a valid instrument for use in evaluating faculty performance. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Agree |
9 |
26.5% |
 |
| Neutral |
8 |
23.5% |
 |
| Disagree |
12 |
35.3% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
5 |
14.7% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.62 |
|
| Q25: 20. The College should develop its own instrument to evaluate faculty performance in the cla... |
| 20. The College should develop its own instrument to evaluate faculty performance in the classroom. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
9 |
26.5% |
 |
| Agree |
13 |
38.2% |
 |
| Neutral |
5 |
14.7% |
 |
| Disagree |
3 |
8.8% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
3 |
8.8% |
 |
| No Opinion |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
4.56 |
|
| Q26: 21. Student evaluations of teaching should include a narrative component. |
| 21. Student evaluations of teaching should include a narrative component. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
19 |
55.9% |
 |
| Agree |
10 |
29.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
1 |
2.9% |
 |
| Disagree |
4 |
11.8% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| No Opinion |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
5.29 |
|
| Q27: 22. Someone other than the course instructor should administer the student evaluations of te... |
| 22. Someone other than the course instructor should administer the student evaluations of teaching. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
17 |
50.0% |
 |
| Agree |
9 |
26.5% |
 |
| Neutral |
4 |
11.8% |
 |
| Disagree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
2 |
5.9% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
4.97 |
|
| Q28: 23. In the current faculty evaluation system, peer review is appropriately employed. |
| 23. In the current faculty evaluation system, peer review is appropriately employed. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Agree |
7 |
20.6% |
 |
| Neutral |
3 |
8.8% |
 |
| Disagree |
14 |
41.2% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
8 |
23.5% |
 |
| No Opinion |
2 |
5.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
34 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.15 |
|
| Q29: 24. A numerically based faculty evaluation system (one that assigns numbers to attributes of... |
| 24. A numerically based faculty evaluation system (one that assigns numbers to attributes of faculty performance) provides a valid means for assessing faculty performance. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
2.6% |
 |
| Agree |
6 |
15.8% |
 |
| Neutral |
9 |
23.7% |
 |
| Disagree |
9 |
23.7% |
 |
| Strongly Disagree |
10 |
26.3% |
 |
| No Opinion |
3 |
7.9% |
 |
| Not Applicable |
0 |
0.0% |
 |
| Totals |
38 |
100.0% |
|
| Mean |
3.21 |
|
| Q30: 25. A narrative based faculty evaluation system (one that describes in words the attributes ... |
| 25. A narrative based faculty evaluation system (one that describes in words the attributes of faculty performance) provides a valid means for assessing faculty performance. |
| |
Counts |
Percents |
|
| Strongly Agree |
13 |
34.2% |
 |
| Agree |
18 |
47.4% |
 |
| Neutral |
2 |
5.3% |
 |
| | |